chtoosha

вот накатала еще одно с учетом исправлений и советов. Еще раз большущее спасибо всем, кто мне помог.

( issue essay )

Мое первое Issue essay.
На него отводится 45 минут. и дается выбор из 2 темок. Я пока просто написала без времени. Сеня напишу еще одно такое длинное и одно аргументное. Тока вот выучу паттерны начала. Еще 3 10-ти минутных теста вербалки, 50 слов и 48 вопросов математики. все жестоко по вечерам в асе не сижу.


Issue essay:
Topic: "Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences, either medical or ethical, are unclear."

Opponents of proposal that government should fund research whose consequences, either medical or ethical are unclear,believe that such researches usually entail the death or torment of both animals and people. Moreover, they think that some researches such as cloning are the crime against God. However, some people believe that government should fund such scientific research regardless of medical or ethical problems. As for me, I think that such researches are necessary and should be funded by government. In next paragraphs I will try to prove my point of view.

The main fact of adversaries are the usual mortal consequences of such scientific such as development of biological or no biological weapons. Up-to-date biological weapon such as virus Ebola entails not only can death of a large number of people and animals but also torment of victims. Moreover, such weapon can become uncontrollable and destroy the Earth. However, the opponents usually forget that it is impossible to stop developing of weapon around the world. If you country stops to develop such weapon another country can do this. In future, it can destroy your country using this new weapon. But, if you country will fund such research it can help to prevent war and develop protection from the same weapon.

The next fact of the opponents again funding researches with unclear consequences is the crime against God. The best example of such research is cloning. Adversaries believe that the cloning human being or animal prevent them to have own soul. Moreover, the creation of new creatures is God’s prerogative.
Nevertheless, there are not any destroy actions were made against cloning centers or scientists. There are not any signs from havens which indicate that cloning is something impropriate. Furthermore, history knows a large number of examples indicating that a lot of people opposed against any scientific progress by saying that this discovery or action is a crime against God. The post-mortem is the best example of people disprove because of ethical and religious aspects. Nevertheless, this actions helped people gain knowledge about themselves.

The last important thing of the results of such researches (mortal viruses or bomb)that they can be obtained by terrorists. In this case all Planet is in danger. However, heretofore we have not known any accidents of stoling results of danger researches. It means that the protected systems for danger researches in countries work properly.

In the end I would like to say that the government should fund any scientific research whose consequences, either medical or ethical, are unclear. This researches are necessary for country. They can prevent the aggression of other country. Moreover, if some research is treated as unethical , we should not forget that any research is a progress regardless it’s ethical aspects. Perhaps, this research will save lives of people in future.


Принимаеются все пожелания и исправления.

Вот родила свое первое критическое ( Эссе )

ПРо ошибки молчУ, так как дико хочу спать. Да, завтра попробую второй вид эссе выдать(их тут 2). Оно должно быть меннее мучительным в силу того, что похоже на тойфовое, тока время больше дают.